18 Performance Reviews
Complements output‑based expectations in Remote Work Expectations and growth resources in Learning & Training.
18.0.1 Cadence & Inputs
Semi‑annual reviews (or client‑aligned cycles). Inputs include: OKRs/project outcomes, quality metrics, peer feedback, incident learnings, documentation quality, and values alignment.
Quarterly feedback remains ongoing and informal (Learning & Training section).
18.0.2 Criteria (Illustrative)
Impact: Delivery vs. scope, measurable outcomes.
Quality: Code/design/test rigor, security hygiene, documentation.
Ownership: Initiative, reliability, risk management.
Collaboration: Communication clarity, mentorship, cross‑team effectiveness.
Growth: Skills progression, learning velocity, and knowledge‑sharing.
18.0.3 Career Levels & Rubrics
Performance is assessed on impact and mastery of core behaviors aligned with our values (Integrity, Digital Stewardship, Antifragility, Collaboration).
Level Progression Matrix:
| Individual Contributor (IC) | Staff/Lead | |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Single project or area; clear outcomes | Multiple projects, teams, or strategic direction |
| Impact | Delivers reliably; raises quality; learns fast | Multiplies team effectiveness; shapes culture & strategy |
| Skills | Domain expertise; good practices | Deep expertise; teaches others; makes tradeoffs |
| Behaviors | Transparent; reliable; asks for help | Unblocks others; delegates; develops talent |
18.0.3.1 Additional Pointers:
Rubric details and level-specific checklists are available in the shared Promotion Guide (updated annually).
Advancement requires demonstrated impact at current level + readiness for next level scope.
Managers discuss level expectations at hire; trajectory is reviewed quarterly.
18.0.4 Outcomes
Ratings and development plans; compensation and promotion decisions (where applicable) follow company policy and market adjustments.
Calibration: Semi‑annual cross‑team calibration ensures consistency. Each rating decision is documented with 2–3 evidence points (examples, incidents, feedback). Ratings and appeals are reviewed in closed calibration sessions.
Appeal & Feedback: If you disagree with your rating, request a one‑on‑one with your manager to discuss. Escalation to People Ops is available if you believe the process was unfair.
18.0.4.1 Additional Pointers:
Come prepared with a self‑review and 2–3 examples of measurable impact.
Peer feedback should be specific, behavioral, and cite examples.
Calibration aims for consistency across teams and levels.